The spreadsheet can't take any more
Formulas nobody dares touch and a different copy on every computer. It works until the day that person goes on holiday.
There's a point where the business stops growing because of what it sells and starts jamming from the inside: the spreadsheet only one person understands, the orders in a notebook, three chats nobody knows who handles. Another tool doesn't fix that.
Plenty of people write “software” when they want a website, and hiring the wrong one is expensive in both directions. The rule I use is this:
Nobody knows you, nobody finds you on Google, or what's out there about you isn't up to what you sell. That's a website: from $850,000 COP and ready in 5 days.
See website pricingPeople write to you and you sell, but inside the process can't keep up: inventory that doesn't add up, a diary that double-books, branches that don't see the same thing. That is custom software.
And if what you want is for WhatsApp to answer and book on its own, that's cheaper than a system: WhatsApp chatbot. The site first, then the chatbot and only then the system: in that order it's cheaper, and that's how I recommend it.
Nobody wakes up wanting to buy software. People get here through one of these six, and almost always after putting up with it too long.
Formulas nobody dares touch and a different copy on every computer. It works until the day that person goes on holiday.
You sell what you don't have, or you're sitting on what you thought you'd sold. Inventory that discounts itself when you invoice ends the argument about who wrote it down wrong.
With three or four professionals on different schedules, the diary stops being a notebook and becomes a software problem.
Each site keeps its numbers however it can and consolidating them is Sunday's job. One of the processes that pays for itself fastest.
One to invoice, another for chat, another for the diary, and the bridge is you copying and pasting. What's missing there isn't another tool: it's integrations.
You don't need the whole platform to find out whether anyone uses it: you need the smallest part that's already useful —an MVP— live, and then decide with data.
They aren't catalogue products: they're the shapes that repeat most, and almost every project is two or three of them together. Whether you look for it as custom software or as “a program for my business”, this is it.
Switch the view and watch what disappears. That's what a commission-based salesperson sees.
8 negocios visibles
New3
Contacted2
Proposal2
Closed1
Example · sample data
Ins, outs, stock by warehouse and the history of who moved what. Today's shared spreadsheet, with rules that can't be skipped.
Several professionals, different durations, blocks, cancellations and reminders. If it also books over chat, it joins up with the chatbot.
You change prices, products, copy or users without writing to me. With roles: nobody sees the whole till by accident.
Where each deal stands, who owns it and when to call back. It's the board up here.
With WhatsApp, with your accounting, with a payment gateway or with the spreadsheet you're not letting go of. As long as the other side has a way in.
If the project is big it doesn't get built all at once: the part that's already useful goes out first and grows from there. Custom applications, not a template forced into shape.
A case that repeats in healthcare: scheduling several professionals, branch control and clinical records. There the site and the system are two different projects and it's better not to mix them —with examples, in websites for clinics and practices.
I publish the price of what has a known shape —a website from $850,000 COP, an online store from $2,500,000 COP—. Software doesn't: two projects described the same way can cost three times as much, and a pretty “from” here is the one that grows later, when you can't turn back. What I do give you is the list of what moves the needle.
How it's paid: in stages and against deliverables. The deposits, the milestones and the balance are written in the proposal before starting, and the general conditions are published in the terms of service. If a stage wasn't delivered, it isn't charged.
This list is worth more than the one above. Everyone says yes to everything in the sales meeting; the problems start afterwards.
Before stage 01
A 20-minute call. If a website suits you and not software, I'll say so right there.
Stage 01
Scope in writing: what gets built, what doesn't, in how many stages and what each one costs.
Stage 02
First useful version, live. The smallest part that's already useful, with your real data.
Stage 03
It gets adjusted through use. Each stage comes out of what got in the way in the last one, not out of an old list.
Stage 04
Handover: code, credentials, documentation, training and 30 days of adjustments at no cost.
The timeline comes out of the scope and is written into the proposal, with dates
The question to ask anyone offering software development is this: show me something of yours that's still running in production. Not a mockup: an address I can open. Here are two, on their own domains.
And I'll say what they are: they're my own products, not client commissions. I built them, on my own and with my money. They don't prove somebody paid me to make them: they prove I can build and keep a complete system standing, which is what you're buying.
Nothing exotic, on purpose: any developer on the market reads all of this, so the day you change hands you don't find a system written in a language only I speak.
They separate whoever is going to deliver from whoever is going to improvise. Ask them in the other quotes you get too.
Because there's no honest price to publish. A website is a product with a known shape and that's why its price is published; software isn't: two projects described the same way in one sentence can cost three times as much depending on how many users, how many roles, how many integrations and how much old data is involved. What I do give you before charging anything is the written proposal with the number in it and the stages separated, so you see where each peso goes.
Twenty minutes is enough to know whether this is solved with software, with a website or with nothing. If something cheaper suits you better, I'll say so right there.